Context
Relevant aspects of environmental sustainability in the sugarcane production chain
Introduction
In its strategic vision with a horizon of 2030, the sugarcane agroindustrial sector seeks to ensure its sustainability by maintaining the balance between three fundamental pillars: social development, environmental conservation and economic development. It is evident, therefore, that improving the environmental performance of the sugarcane production chain must contribute significantly to the achievements outlined within the framework of sustainability.
To this end, mills and growers are aligned with the fulfillment of common goals that seek to reduce the consumption of inputs and water, the generation of waste and discharges, and ensure that the production of sugar and its derivatives meets international standards. of sustainability. With this, the sector ratifies its commitment to society and the environment and gives added value to its products. The achievements and actions of the Colombian sugar sector in terms of environmental sustainability are highlighted below, the result of joint work in recent years between mills, growers and Cenicaña.
About the authors
Múnera Castañeda, BE
Sanitary and Environmental Engineer. Sugar Cane Research Center.
Palacios García, D.
Coordinator of the Diversification and Sustainability Area at Cenicaña
Gil Zapata, N.
Ph.D. Factory Process Program Director – Cenicaña
Colombia Sugar Cane Research Center [Cenicaña] (2016) Final report on the 2016 water project. http://bibliotecadigital.cenicana.org:8080/handle/item/6408.
The Association of Sugar Cane Growers of Colombia [Asocaña] (2017). Annual report 2016-2017. https://www.asocana.org/modules/documentos/14140.aspx.
Palacios García, D. et al. (2015, September 16-18). Life cycle analysis of the Colombian sugar sector as a tool to determine its greenhouse gas emissions. X Technical Congress 2015. Cali, Colombia
Renewable Fuels Association [RFA] (2022). Annual World Fuel Ethanol Production. World Fuel Ethanol Production by Region. RFA. https://ethanolrfa.org/markets-andstatistics/annual-ethanol-production
Ecoinvent. 2018. Ecoinvent (version 3.5). https://ecoinvent.org/the-ecoinvent-database/data-releases/ecoinvent-3-9-1/.
ANA (2009). Manual for the conservation and reuse of water in the sugar-energy agroindustry/ Agência Nacional de Águas; Federation of industries of the State of São Paulo; Sugarcane Industry Union; Canavieira Technology Center. Brasilia.
Alverson, R. (2013). “Re-thinking the Carbon Reduction Value of Corn Ethanol Fuel,” Ethanol Across America.
Amell, A.; Chejne, F.; Lopez, D.; Forero, C.; Herrera, B.; Alvarado, P.; Ceballos, CM; Giraldo, SY; Porras, J.; Mejía, AF and Velasco, FJ (2016). Technical consulting for the strengthening and improvement of the database of emission factors for Colombian fuels. Medellin. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.010.
Bravo, JE; Estrada Bedón, A.; Gomez Perlaza, AL; Isaacs Echeverri, CH; Castro Fori, PW and Bejarano R., L. (2010). Experimental measurement and economic evaluation of fuel consumption in sugarcane transportation equipment. Quarterly Letter, Cenicaña, pp. 55–59.
Environment and Climate Change Canada (2016). Technical Guidance on Reporting Greenhouse Gas Emissions. http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2016/eccc/En81-6-2016-eng.pdf.
Boy, D.; Santiago, A. and Garrido, A. (2015). Increasing efficiency in ethanol production: Water footprint and economic productivity of sugarcane ethanol under nine different water regimes in north-eastern Brazil. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 13 (2), p. e1203.
Cruz Valderrama, JR (2015). Hydrological balance of supply and demand of water for irrigation in a productive unit. In: Efficient irrigation management in sugarcane cultivation in the geographic valley of the Cauca River. Ashen. Cali, Colombia, p. 60-81.
Galdos, M.; Cavalett, O.; Seabra, JEA; Nogueira, LAH and Bonomi, A. (2013). Trends in global warming and human health impacts related to Brazilian sugarcane ethanol production considering black carbon emissions. Applied Energy, 104 pp. 576–582. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.11.002.
Garcia Arbelaez, C.; Vallejo, G.; Higgins, M. Lou and Escobar, E.M. (2016). The Paris Agreement. This is how Colombia will act in the face of climate change. Available at: http://www. minambiente.gov.co/images/cambioclimatico/pdf/colombia_hacia_la_COP21/el_ acceso_de_paris_frente_a_cambio_climatico.pdf.
Gerbens-Leenes, PW; Hoekstra, A.Y. (2009). The water footprint of sweeteners and bioethanol from sugar cane, sugar beet and corn. Value of Water Research Report Series No. 38. UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education.
Hoefnagels, R.; Smeets, E. and Faaij, A. (2010). Greenhouse gas footprints of different biofuel production systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14 (7), pp. 1661–1694. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.02.014.
Hoekstra, A.Y., & Hung, P.Q. (2002). Virtual water trade: A quantification of virtual water flows between nations in relation to international crop trade. Value of Water Research Report Series No. 11. UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft, Netherlands. Hoekstra, A.Y.; Chapagain, AK; Aldaya, MM; Mekonnen, MM (2009). The Water Footprint Assessment Manual: Setting the Global Standard. Water Footprint Network.
IDEAM, UNDP, MADS, DNP and CHANCELLERY. (2015). Colombia's first biennial update report to the United Nations framework convention on Climate Change, Bogotá DC, Colombia. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004. Available at: http://documentacion.ideam.gov.co/openbiblio/bvirtual/023423/1_INFORME_BIENAL_ACTUALIZACION.pdf
________________________. (2017). Executive summary Third National Communication of Colombia to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Third National Communication on Climate Change. Available at: http://documentacion.ideam.gov.co/openbiblio/bvirtual/023732/RESUMEN_ EJECUTIVO_TCNCC_COLOMBIA.pdf.
IPCC (2013). IPCC Fifth Assessment Report: Climate Change. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/index_es.shtml.
ISO 14044. (2006). Environmental management—Life cycle analysis—Requirements and guidelines. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui#iso:std:iso:14044:ed-1:v1:es
ISO 14040. (2006). Environmental management — Life cycle analysis — Principles and reference framework.https://www.iso.org/obp/ui#iso:std:iso:14040:ed-2:v1:es
ISO 14046. (2014). Environmental management — Water footprint — Principles, requirements and guidelines. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui#iso:std:iso:14046:ed-1:v1:es
ISO 14067. (2018). Greenhouse gases — Carbon footprint of products — Requirements and guidelines for quantification. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui#iso:std:iso:14067:ed-1:v1:es
ISO 14064. (2019). Greenhouse gases — Project-level specification with guidance for quantifying, monitoring and reporting emissions reductions or increases in greenhouse gas removals https://www.iso.org/obp /ui#iso:std:iso:14064:-2:ed-2:v1:es
Macedo, IC; Seabra, JE and Silva, JE (2008). Green house gases emissions in the production and use of ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil: The 2005/2006 averages and a prediction for 2020”, Biomass and Bioenergy, 32 (7), pp. 582–595. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.12.006.
Mueller, S. and Unnash, S. (2016). Greenhouse Gas Life Cycle Analysis of US-Produced Corn Ethanol for Export to Global Markets.
NOAA (2015). Global Climate Change Indicators. Available at: https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/monitoring-references/faq/indicators.php (Accessed: March 15, 2018).
Scarpare, F.; Hernandes, T.; Ruiz-Corrêa, S.; Kolln, O.; Gava, G.; dos Santos, L. and Victoria, R. (2016). Sugarcane water footprint under different management practices in Brazil: Tietê/Jacaré watershed assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112,pp. 4576-4584.
World Economic Forum (2018). The Global Risks Report 2018 (No. 13th). The Global Competitiveness and Risk Team. Geneva, Switzerland. Available at: https://www.marsh.com/content/dam/marsh/Documents/PDF/eu/en/the-global-risksreport- 2018.pdf
- Sugar cane. 2. Agribusiness. 3. Water footprint. 4. Greenhouse gases. 5. Carbon footprint. 6. Environmental management.
Múnera Castañeda, BE, Palacios García, D. & Gil Zapata, NJ (2023). Relevant aspects of environmental sustainability in the sugarcane production chain. In: Colombian Sugarcane Research Center (Ed). Sugar cane agroindustry in Colombia. Cinderella
